Breaking the habit of being yourself featured image
When people in our community ask me which modern book sits closest to Neville Goddard, the one I hear about most is Breaking the Habit of Being Yourself by Dr Joe Dispenza. So here is my honest review. Breaking the Habit of Being Yourself is Dispenza’s guide to changing the thoughts, feelings and behaviours that keep a familiar identity in place. It combines meditation and mental rehearsal with big claims about the brain, the body and personal reality, and those claims deserve to be separated carefully, which is exactly what I will do here before setting the method beside Neville’s assumption and revision.
Affiliate disclosure: we may earn a small commission if you buy through an Amazon link on this page, at no extra cost to you. It never changes what I write about a book.
Dispenza’s central argument is that the self you experience each day is shaped by repeated thought and emotion. Thoughts influence how you feel, feelings influence what you do, and repeated actions reinforce the same patterns. Over time the cycle makes a particular personality feel permanent. His phrase for it is that your personality creates your personal reality.
In the book’s model, a person who keeps thinking from fear or resentment also rehearses the bodily and emotional states that go with those thoughts. The body becomes familiar with those states, and the familiar begins to feel like identity. To change your life, Dispenza argues, you have to stop automatically thinking and feeling as the old self. He calls this “unmemorising” the old you.
That is the promise behind the title. Breaking the habit of being yourself does not mean erasing your history or pretending difficult experiences never happened. It means noticing habitual patterns, learning to interrupt them, and practising a different response often enough for it to become your natural one.
The book then asks you to imagine a new version of yourself and rehearse that identity in meditation. Instead of waiting for a future event to make you feel changed, you practise the thoughts, emotions and choices of the person you intend to become. There is a useful question at the centre of it all: what would I think, feel and do differently if I were no longer repeating this pattern?
The book’s most persuasive idea is also its most practical: repeated responses become habitual. A familiar cue prompts a familiar thought or feeling, which leads to a familiar action. Each time the loop runs, it takes less deliberate attention to follow it.
I know this loop from the inside. Raised as a Jehovah’s Witness and then a Baptist, I carried a very specific habit of being myself for decades: a background feeling of unworthiness and of being watched by an external, judgemental God. I walked away from the church at 18, but the habit of feeling came with me into what I now call the far country. Leaving the building was easy. Leaving the state took practice.
This does not mean personality is fixed, or that every hard experience is simply a habit to overcome. It means some of what we call identity is held up by patterns of attention and behaviour, and those patterns can be examined and changed with repetition.
Research on habit formation supports the value of repetition in a stable context, while showing that change is neither instant nor identical for everyone. In a 2010 field study, Phillippa Lally and colleagues at University College London followed people building a new everyday habit by repeating it in the same context. Automaticity rose quickly at first and then levelled off, and the time it took varied widely from person to person. A 2012 review in the British Journal of General Practice summarises that work well. The modest conclusion is that repetition builds automaticity. It does not establish that meditation alone can remake a person.
For you, the practical implication is to tie inner rehearsal to a specific action. If you are practising a more confident self, choose one small behaviour that expresses it, such as asking a clear question in a meeting or keeping a promise you made to yourself, and repeat it in the same setting.
Dispenza presents meditation as the way to become aware of habitual thoughts and feelings instead of letting them run the day. The broad practice is to settle attention, observe the familiar self without identifying with it, and then mentally rehearse how you intend to think, feel and act.
He asks you to pair the rehearsal with emotion: feel the new self now, rather than waiting for circumstances to produce the feeling. Anyone who has studied Neville will recognise that instruction instantly.
Mental rehearsal has a credible but limited basis in research. In a 1995 study published in the Journal of Neurophysiology, Alvaro Pascual-Leone and colleagues compared mental and physical practice of a five-finger piano exercise. Mental practice alone was associated with changes in the motor cortex similar to physical practice, although the people who physically practised performed better. The finding supports the idea that imagined practice engages some of the same learning. It does not show that visualisation alone produces any chosen result in the outside world.
A simple sequence for applying the method:
If sitting still is uncomfortable, start with five minutes, keep your eyes open, or rehearse in writing. If meditation brings up distress, stop and ground yourself in the room, and speak to a qualified professional if it persists. Forcing an intense practice is not proof of commitment.
This is where I part company with the way the book is often sold online. Breaking the habit of being yourself is not something that happens in one powerful weekend meditation. Think of a blacksmith. No single blow of the hammer shapes the iron. The metal goes back into the fire again and again, and each strike moves it a little closer to the form the smith already holds in mind. Some strikes land badly. The smith does not blame the iron or the hammer. He heats it and strikes again.
That is how I teach the Law at TrueCosmic. The Law is a practice, not a trick. The people who live it, rather than occasionally stumble into a result, are the ones who return to the forge every day. Dispenza’s best chapters agree with this, and they are the chapters I would point you to first.
Readers can mistake emotional intensity during a meditation for lasting change. The real test is the following Tuesday morning, when the old trigger arrives and you either respond as the old self or the new one.
The book draws on ideas with real value: attention, repetition, mental rehearsal and neuroplasticity, the brain’s ability to reorganise itself with learning and experience. Neuroplasticity supports the possibility of learning new skills and responses. It does not mean that every imagined change becomes a physical fact.
Expectation and placebo research also helps explain why belief and context influence how people experience symptoms and treatment. That is a reason to take expectation seriously, not proof that belief can cure any illness.
The weaker sections arrive when Dispenza uses quantum language to make large claims about healing and about mind shaping matter. The observer effect in physics concerns measurement, and it does not show that personal intention selects everyday events. Likewise, the discussion of epigenetics cannot by itself show that meditation steers gene activity towards a chosen outcome. Healing stories can be moving, but anecdotes cannot establish what caused a recovery. Please treat the book’s exercises as self-development practices, never as a substitute for medical care.
I say this as someone who once needed that kind of scientific reassurance badly. When I first met these principles my rational mind pushed back hard, and a film and book called What the Bleep Do We Know!? gave me the comfort that I was not going mad. Looking back, it was the practice that changed me, not the physics. That is the danger of leaning on the worldly wise: if your faith rests on a borrowed scientific claim, it falls the day the claim is questioned. If it rests on what you have tested in your own life, it stands.
Dispenza and Neville both put inner experience at the centre of change. Both ask you to practise a new state inwardly instead of letting present circumstances dictate every thought and feeling. Their language differs, but the methods share a spine.
Neville teaches the assumption of the wish fulfilled: feel inwardly that the state you want is already yours, and live from it. Living in the end means thinking from the completed outcome rather than towards it. His revision technique, replaying the day’s events at night as you wish they had gone, is a close cousin of Dispenza’s evening rehearsal. If you want the original, start with Feeling Is the Secret and then our complete guide to The Power of Awareness. For the full reading list, see the top 11 Neville Goddard books.
Dispenza wraps the practice in biology: conditioning, brain chemistry and the body. Neville presents assumption as a spiritual principle, with your own I AM as the creative power and scripture as the map. Neither one needs the other’s explanation for the exercise to work as a practice.
Where they meet most usefully is on the mistake both warn against: trying to control the route. When I was in my early twenties I was set on buying my first home, and the house I had my heart on fell through because I was in a chain. I had decided exactly how it would happen, and that route collapsed. A year later I bought a different house that was bigger, in a better area and cheaper. Micromanaging the how is the biggest manifestation mistake I see. Dispenza says it in his language when he tells you to stop predicting how the new future will arrive; Neville says it in his when he tells you to assume the end and leave the means alone.
The overlap is valuable as long as you do not confuse a shared exercise with shared evidence. Practising the feeling of an assumption shapes attention, expectation and behaviour. For how that works in the brain, read the neuroscience of manifestation and how visualisation rewires your brain.
Breaking the Habit of Being Yourself suits readers who enjoy guided meditation, reflective exercises and a strong account of how repeated thoughts and feelings shape behaviour. It also suits people who want a structured way to examine an identity that feels stuck, as long as they are willing to turn reflection into action.
If you already love Neville, you will recognise the rehearsal of an inner state, and you may find Dispenza’s scientific framing heavier than you need. If you want a strictly evidence-based account of neuroscience, the book will at times go beyond what its evidence shows.
It is least useful as a passive read. The ideas make sense when you test them against ordinary decisions: how you respond to a familiar trigger, what you repeat, and what changes when you practise another response. The same is true of the work we do in the Academy, where The Assumed Self: Subconscious Reprogramming Intensive takes you through assumption and reprogramming step by step, and of reprogramming the subconscious mind while sleeping.
Buy it if you want a detailed, meditation-centred approach to examining habitual thoughts and rehearsing a different way of being. Read it with discernment: its practical ideas about attention and practice are far more defensible than its larger claims about healing and physics. My verdict on breaking the habit of being yourself is simple. Use the exercises, keep a notebook of what you actually practise and observe, and let your own results be the evidence.
Get Breaking the Habit of Being Yourself on Amazon
Whatever habit of being yourself you are carrying right now, the way out is already inside you. The same intelligence that formed every star and every cell is present in your own awareness, waiting for you to use it. Nobody can practise it for you, and nothing outside you can stop it once you do. So take the first step tonight, and do not be afraid.
Yes. A beginner can follow its central ideas about observing thoughts, meditating and rehearsing new responses. The book uses a lot of scientific and spiritual language, so test one exercise at a time rather than trying to absorb it all at once.
The main idea is that your personality, built from repeated thoughts, feelings and actions, shapes the life you experience, and that you can change it by interrupting the old patterns and rehearsing a new self in meditation until it becomes natural.
Both teach that you change your life by practising a new inner state before the outer evidence arrives. Neville calls it assuming the feeling of the wish fulfilled and frames it spiritually; Dispenza frames it through the brain and body. The core practice is very similar.
No. The research it draws on supports the role of attention, rehearsal and repetition in changing behaviour. It does not prove that thoughts alone determine external events, and its healing claims rest mainly on anecdotes.
Enter your email and get instant FREE access to your report.
No credit card required. 🔒 Your details are secure. You can unsubscribe at any time.
Out of This World is Neville Goddard’s 1949 exploration of imagination, assumptions, and the experience…
The parable of the talents meaning has nothing to do with money, and it took…
Mental rehearsal is the deliberate practice of imagining a performance or outcome before it happens.…
A self fulfilling prophecy is not simply a prediction that happens to come true. It…
Conocimiento esotérico Más de dos mil millones de personas en este planeta se identifican como…
¿Qué es manifestar? Manifestar es la práctica, basada en la Ley de la Suposición de…